<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 3 Good Reasons to Protect Your PDF Today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bookguardpro.com/protect-pdf-blog/119/3-good-reasons-to-protect-your-pdf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bookguardpro.com/protect-pdf-blog/119/3-good-reasons-to-protect-your-pdf/</link>
	<description>Protect Digital eBook and PDF Files with Secure PDF Security Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 06:13:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: PDF Security Advisors</title>
		<link>http://bookguardpro.com/protect-pdf-blog/119/3-good-reasons-to-protect-your-pdf/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>PDF Security Advisors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 08:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bookguardpro.com/protect-pdf-blog/?p=119#comment-413</guid>
		<description>Hello, yes that is true (to a degree) anytime you place anything on a screen for people to view. For example, anyone can take a photo of the screen and publish that. But you&#039;re missing the point. The goal is to make it time-consuming and more difficult to do. That stops over 99% of the problem. At a very low cost. And most publishers have the negative experience with zero protection, to know taking some simple, low cost steps are worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, yes that is true (to a degree) anytime you place anything on a screen for people to view. For example, anyone can take a photo of the screen and publish that. But you&#8217;re missing the point. The goal is to make it time-consuming and more difficult to do. That stops over 99% of the problem. At a very low cost. And most publishers have the negative experience with zero protection, to know taking some simple, low cost steps are worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: random_noob</title>
		<link>http://bookguardpro.com/protect-pdf-blog/119/3-good-reasons-to-protect-your-pdf/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>random_noob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bookguardpro.com/protect-pdf-blog/?p=119#comment-412</guid>
		<description>please tell me how you want to protect pdf&#039;s from people using print screen + ocr technique hahah this is where you app fails i bet. if someone wants to stuff shared he will, you can&#039;t help it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please tell me how you want to protect pdf&#8217;s from people using print screen + ocr technique hahah this is where you app fails i bet. if someone wants to stuff shared he will, you can&#8217;t help it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Control</title>
		<link>http://bookguardpro.com/protect-pdf-blog/119/3-good-reasons-to-protect-your-pdf/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Control</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bookguardpro.com/protect-pdf-blog/?p=119#comment-228</guid>
		<description>thank you for your article- best wishes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you for your article- best wishes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

